In a ruling recently issued, the court rejected a woman's claim to enforce a draft agreement for the purchase of an apartment in Eilat, after the seller retracted from the transaction. The judge ruled that the draft did not become a binding contract due to the lack of definitive intent and essential details that were not agreed upon, such as the payment schedule. The seller claimed he did not wish to sell the apartment for personal reasons, and the woman sued for damages caused by the sale of her previous apartment. Although the judge found that the seller acted in bad faith, he did not award damages to the woman, as no harm was proven. Additionally, it was determined that the draft exchanged between the lawyers was insufficient to prove a binding agreement. The ruling emphasizes the need for definitive intent and full agreement between the parties to establish a binding contract in real estate transactions.